Made in Ukraine
PLAY NOW
INSTANTLY AND FREE
DOWNLOAD
FREE INSTALL AND PLAY

Purchased coins and their prizes

I bought some coins for my hero Pixie to spin the wheel.  I am only using Pixie as a base for my explorers and have no interest in expanding her.  One of the prizes I won with my purchased coins was a blueprint which my other hero can use.  However unlike a blueprint I bought I cannot send the BP I won to my other hero.  Surely if I win something with a coin I used EC to buy it should be transferable like all other purchased items.
9 years ago Quote
9 years ago Quote

No it shouldn't. I will only motivate to abuse the game by creating fake heroes like you did.

Edited 17 seconds later by .
9 years ago Quote
9 years ago Quote

I most certainly did not make a "fake hero".  Once again I was  dumped in a very crowded place and I would have been left once again in a place with no room to expand.  I was playing that hero but when I realised that there was no room I decided to move.  I may decide to go back and play that hero at some stage and I am not using my EC to create a fake hero, one I might add, that I wasted several thousand of my EC on.  I will be using that hero to clear the fog and if more people around there delete I will play that hero.  If it was a fake hero do you seriously think I would waste my money on it.  Once again this has to do with all of us being lumped in together and squashed and as this has happened to me in EVERY alpha so far I wasn't going to repeat that experience.  So please do not insult me and  accuse me of being underhanded in some way.  If you care to check my balance you will see that I do not need to "cheat"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  It was also the reason I asked in the game yesterday about carrying unspent EC forward.  If the answer to that had been no - then I would have wasted it over in that spot.
Further to that I am sure you can see exactly how much money I wasted on Pixie and the fact that I demolished a lot of my buildings. Not only that I did aske someone over there last night if they wanted to do a protectorate, that way if I do decide to go back and play that hero, who will be playing catch up with everyone else around there, and I wouldn't be getting attacked every 5 minutes.

Edited 6 minutes later by .
9 years ago Quote
9 years ago Quote

I have something else to add to that, in what world does spending 2500 on coins in order to win resources to upgrade my scout lodge, make that account fake.  I could very easily have just spent that money buying coins to spin the wheel in Dagdas to try and win a blueprint, but as I already bought a load for him, the blueprint in question would have been of no immediate benefit to him.  It was a simple question and only needed a one word answer and not the accusation you have thrown at me.

9 years ago Quote
9 years ago Quote

The "fake" hero refers to the hero which is not intended to play on it's own, but to use it as a supplementary/backup for other hero, doesn't matter whether you supply fog reveal, or items or resources. It is also unimportant if you spend any money on it or not as that does not change hero's purpose. The game will not motivate using this kind of heroes and their usage will be limited in the future even more, just like we disabled trading between your heroes back in the days, let alone adding features which will motivate that kind of behavior.

Also I think your reaction is too proactive, by treating my clarification as accusation.

Edited 1 minute later by .
9 years ago Quote
9 years ago Quote

Okay well maybe I should have asked you for clarification about your use of the word "fake",  given that English is not your first language, but it was not only me that made the assumption that you where accusing me of cheating or setting up "fake" accounts to gain some kind of advantage.  I was out all afternoon and when I got back I had 5 FB messages from other players who felt that your response was an accusation. 
It was put to you half way through the last phase that you should limit the accounts that we can have and you said that at that time, that for the moment 5 was fine but you may revise that in the future.
As for Pixie - I spent a week and  500 000 thousand EC on building up her domain but as I cleared the fog I realised just how close we all are, so I decided that I would keep that domain and explore from there,  I don't see how that would give me an advantage over anyone else.  If I joined an alliance that belonged to someone  over there and they had the fog cleared I could see it.  Equally I could have kept playing her, started an alliance with my other hero and invited Pixie to the alliance, if that is okay then I don't get what the problem is with me keeping Pixie.  
However I will speak to you about this matter in private, if you feel my reaction was OTT then I apologise but I'm sure you can understand that there is an ambiguity in the word fake, and when used in the context it was, it  lead me to jump to the conclusion I did. 

9 years ago Quote
9 years ago Quote

Like I said before, it doesn't matter how much money was spent on particular hero and what motives were present at hero creation, but if one hero in the end is used solely to compliment another hero (revealing fog or sending troops/resources) that is technically a "fake" account, no matter how you put it. I am not putting any subtext for this term, but we are not going to encourage using such heroes in any way, only limiting their interaction with other heroes.

My referring to "fake" hero was not an accusation, but a fact. Accusation is how you treated my words.

The multiple heroes here are designed to be played as completely separated entities, they were not desigend to be used in any sort of conjunction with each other. The fact that not all kinds of interaction are limited between heroes at this moment is because it is not a critical issue for us right now, and not because it was an expected behavior.

Edited 5 minutes later by .
9 years ago Quote
9 years ago Quote